> > > That's why you should put the navigation bar: > > > 1. in structural markup (not a table) > > > 2. at the bottom of the file > >Been there - doesn't work. > Besides, accessibility will only happen if there's an easy way for the > average webmaster to make it happen, and a simple CSS line would make it > much easier than either of your points. Exactly. .navbar { play: optional; skip: true; } Simplicity itself. And when it is applied, visually you could have:- [home] [mail] [back] ... to: [skip] [home] [mail] [back] ... Or whatever, based on a UA's built in style processor; And aurally: "Now follows another stupid navigation bar that you've heard a million times before. To skip this bar, please holler 'aaargh!' now." Please, CSS WG, take note. Maybe better: .navbar { play: optional; allow-skip: true; alt: uri(#intro); } Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer WAP Tech Info - http://www.waptechinfo.com/Received on Friday, 13 October 2000 11:28:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:06 GMT