On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Steffen Goeldner wrote: >> >> This problem is discussed by Håkon Lie, see >> http://www.operasoft.com/people/howcome/1999/foch.html > > [...] > > If GIF is on rung 1, SVG is on rung 3 only. Compare it with > DrawML, which was an early submission for web graphic! > > <http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-drawml-19981203> > > I would place it on rung 5. [...] > > Consequently, it is quite possible that a standard > specification slithers down on the ladder of abstraction. Right. But XSL:FO is down in the negative rungs somewhere... -- Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL Netscape, Standards Compliance QA /. `- ' ( `--' +1 650 937 6593 `- , ) - > ) \ irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________Received on Friday, 13 October 2000 05:19:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:06 GMT