On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Tantek Celik wrote: > From: Ian Hickson <ianh@netscape.com> >>> Uhm, in what way is XHTML 'semantic'. >> Headers, paragraphs, citations, quotes, variables, sample code, >> definitions, lists -- they are all mark-up-able without even suggesting a >> formatting style. > > Uh, no. > > XHTML itself has no semantics. All it does is point to HTML4.x which _does_ > have semantics (as you listed). Go check the XHTML spec. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/ says: # The semantics of the elements and their attributes are defined in the # W3C Recommendation for HTML 4. So the elements and attributes have semantics. Those semantics are defined somewhere other than the spec itself, but that is a secondary issue. Your argument is like saying that the grammar of CSS2 has no meaning because we do not define the whole of LL(1), we only point to it. -- Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL Netscape, Standards Compliance QA /. `- ' ( `--' +1 650 937 6593 `- , ) - > ) \ irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________Received on Monday, 2 October 2000 20:28:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:06 GMT