W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2000

RE: box-sizing alternative

From: Joe Hewitt <joe@joehewitt.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 14:20:12 -0500
To: "'Matthew Brealey'" <thelawnet@yahoo.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000201bf82ea$00b93880$31cfb326@zenimax.com>

> > The basis of my argument was that 'box-sizing' is not an intuitive
> > solution,
> > and this is a better solution.
>
> What isn't intuitive about it?

I have gone into a great deal of detail in previous posts about this.  Did
you not read them?

Received on Tuesday, 29 February 2000 14:16:31 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Joe Hewitt: "RE: box-sizing alternative"
Previous message: Joe Hewitt: "RE: box-sizing alternative"
In reply to: Matthew Brealey: "RE: box-sizing alternative"
Next in thread: Joe Hewitt: "RE: box-sizing alternative"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:04 GMT