On 24 Feb 2000, John Lewis wrote: >Matthew Brealey wrote: > >>At present it is - colour ink is very expensive, so to waste >>your customer/page viewer's money on colour ink, which adds >>nothing to printed pages (black is almost always better and >>much faster). > >Is something wrong with letting the user decide for himself? >I'm not aware of any web browser that doesn't let the user >choose how to print his documents--if there are problems >that CSS should address, you have my apologies. A page that looks OK on a colour display, or printed in colour, might be hard to read in monochrome. I read a UK paper that's printed in colour in London and in mono in Manchester, and sometimes (presumably when last-minute changes have been made) the Manchester edition is very hard to read, usually because of a lack of contrast. One solution is to design with a mono rendering in mind; another is to distinguish style suggestions for colour and mono display. -- Tim Bannister - isoma@compsoc.man.ac.uk "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin DisraeliReceived on Friday, 25 February 2000 04:51:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:04 GMT