W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 1999

Re: Minor error in CSS2, section 14.2; 'background'

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:43:54 +0200
Message-ID: <37E7FC1A.2A0356BD@w3.org>
To: gordon <gordon@quartz.gly.fsu.edu>
CC: "'www-style'" <www-style@w3.org>

gordon wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Braden N. McDaniel <braden@shadow.net>

> > If the HTML node had "historically not been rendered", we would not be
> able
> > to see HTML documents in browsers! The BODY and HEAD nodes are children of
> > the HTML node. Thus, if the HTML node is not rendered, by definition one
> > would not be able to see its children.
> This is downright silly as it asserts that one faces an all-or-nothing
> scenario in which case one would also render the head node as well.

No, not silly at all. And not an all or nothing scenario either, except
that it is I suppose all or nothing on a per element basis.

It just requires looking at a tree structured view. Or to put it another
way, noting that an element includes its start tag, its end tag, and all
of its content (including its children).

So clearly, the HTML element is rendered - otherwise nothing would be
seen. And clearly, the HEAD element is not rendered. In other words

html > head {display: none }
html > body {display: block }


html { display: none} 

which would produce completely empty result trees and thus, no content.

Received on Tuesday, 21 September 1999 17:44:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:51 UTC