- From: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@der.edfgdf.fr>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 09:33:20 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: jelks@jelks.nu
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
> I believe the comparison is to the HTC stuff, not the selector mechanisms or the > event-handlers-in-css. > > That is, the comparison was that both HTC and ECMA-290 describe components as > objects with properties, methods, and events, but "wrapped" in Markup. > > For that matter, HTC also resembles early prototypes of Microsoft's Windows > Script Components (WSC), but without any of the latter's refinements -- I didn't > see discernable differences between the HTC stuff introduced with IE5 beta 1 and > the incarnation found in BECSS (it's certainly not pretty or elegant at this > stage, IMO). Excellent comments. Quite nothing to add to that diagnosis. Take a look at [1]. [1] http://www.ecma.ch/memento/tc39.htm </Daniel feeling="don't even ask...">
Received on Thursday, 21 October 1999 03:34:23 UTC