On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Peter Linss wrote: > They also don't have to have the same element name, so if ReviewML > calls their "paragraph-type" elements "foo" then being able to declare > both namespaces with the same prefix still does not allow you to > address both elements with one selector. Hmm. Very good point. >>> This would be the moral equivalent to some declaration like: >>> @equivalence heading { h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 } >>> heading { color: blue } >>> rather than saying: >>> h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { color: blue } > I wasn't proposing a formal syntax, just an example to illustrate the concept. Yes... I think this concept is much better than what I was proposing, certainly for this kind of thing. It has been proposed before, though. And I'm not sure I've ever been in favour or found a decent syntax... -- Ian Hickson : Is your JavaScript ready for Nav5 and IE5? : Get the latest JavaScript client sniffer at : http://developer.netscape.com/docs/examples/javascript/browser_type.htmlReceived on Monday, 4 October 1999 17:51:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:00 GMT