W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 1999

Re: CSS-Tranformation mechanism and modularizing CSS

From: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@der.edf.fr>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 11:26:49 +0200
Message-ID: <37F872D9.5EEA0D72@der.edf.fr>
To: jelks@jelks.nu
CC: www-style@w3.org
Jelks Cabaniss wrote:

> Sorry.[1]  But you got me back -- I couldn't find "locutor"[2] even in the
> dictionary...

Oh :-)))) Sorry !!! I read to many books about linguistics and just
anglicized the french word "locuteur". From my E/F dictionnary :

    locuteur, -trice : (noun, Linguistics) speaker

> According to the section on script blocks[3] it does:
> 
>           @script {
>             var count = 0;
>             function checkCount() {
>               if (document.getElementsById("radio").value == "add") {
>                 count++;
>               }
>               else {
>                 count--;
>               }
>             }
>           }
> 
> Do we really want to formally allow this kind of stuff inside a CSS
> stylesheet???

But it does not add ability to existing CSS properties to get a script-based
value ! Only Behavioral Extensions can use such a script-block.

</Daniel>
Received on Monday, 4 October 1999 05:27:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:00 GMT