W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 1999

Re: Various comments on selectors' Test Suite

From: Matthew Brealey <thelawnet@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:45:42 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <19991122174542.29279.rocketmail@web901.mail.yahoo.com>
To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
--- "Eric A. Meyer" <emeyer@sr71.lit.cwru.edu> wrote:
> >5.5 Descendant selectors
> >	I suggest "Descendant combinators" instead of
> "Descendant selectors"
> >	and more generally use "combinators" when
> appropriate (5.5 -> 5.7)
> 
>    For page titles, I went with reproducing the
> section titles in the
> specification, but I'm willing to be talked out of
> that approach if enough
> people agree with you.
This is an interesting if entirely inconsequential
question.

I would agree (with Daniel). According to the CSS
grammar.

BODY P is a selector, with BODY a simple selector, P a
simple selector, and ' ' a combinator (defined thus in
the grammar:
: '+' S* | '>' S* | /* empty */)

=====
----------------------------------------------------------
From Matthew Brealey (http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet (for law)or http://members.tripod.co.uk/lawnet/WEBFRAME.HTM (for CSS))
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
Received on Monday, 22 November 1999 12:45:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:01 GMT