W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 1999

Re: Pseudo-class change

From: Bert Bos <Bert.Bos@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:10:44 +0200 (MET DST)
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <14237.44692.372662.44869@www43.inria.fr>
Sue Sims writes:
 > From: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1#anchor-pseudo-classes
 > "Note that normal class names precede pseudo-classes in the selector. "
 > 
 > From: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/selector.html#pseudo-classes
 > "Pseudo-classes are allowed anywhere in selectors ... "
 > 
 > If this is intended as a change, should it not be included in:
 > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/changes.html

Yes, I think this was intended as a change.

All the changes to the selectors are summarized in one line in
appendix B1: "An extended selector mechanism, including child
selectors, adjacent selectors, and attribute selectors." Maybe the
relaxation of the syntax of class selectors (more than one is now
allowed) and pseudo-classes could have been made explicit.

 > 
 > If an error in CSS1, should it not be included in the ersatz errata:
 > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1#appendix-f

No, it's not an error in CSS1. The syntax was restricted on purpose,
to make implementations easier and to gain some experience.


Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos/                              W3C/INRIA
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 1999 09:10:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:59 GMT