W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 1999

Re: 24. Gradient & stretched backgrounds

From: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:10:54 -0800
Message-ID: <002401be401b$8582f780$15a8a8c0@dper>
To: "www-style" <www-style@w3.org>
From: Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk>
> 'background-repeat'
>    Value:       repeat | repeat-x | repeat-y |
>                 no-repeat [INS:] | stretch [:INS] | inherit
>    Initial:     repeat
>    Applies to:  all elements
>    Inherited:   no
>    Percentages: N/A
>    Media:       visual

How about two more: 'stretch-x' and 'stretch-y'?

Stretch-x would size-to-fit in the x direction and repeat in the y,
stretch-y would size-to-fit in the y and repeat in the x. This would allow
textured gradients.

'Stretch' is not descriptive for all possibilities. The image might need to
be shrunk to fit a smaller box, so it's more a 'fit' than a 'stretch'.
Perhaps there is a better name for this value.

Authors would almost certainly not want the same background image for
gradient as for non-gradient background. So... for backward compatibility an
author would specify an element's background twice using the 'background'
shorthand? With different URL and new attribute in the second declaration
thus overriding the first if the UA understands the new value?

David Perrell
Received on Thursday, 14 January 1999 19:10:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:49 UTC