- From: Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:42:47 +0000 (BST)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
- cc: css2-editors@w3.org
Firstly, in CSS1 background-position was relative to the content edge, in CSS2 it is relative to the padding edge. Appendix B of CSS2 does not list this as a change, yet it is actually quite important. Is this an error in the description of CSS2, the description of CSS1, or CSS2's Appendix B? Personally, I would suggest that the background-position should be relative to the content edge; if only so that a value of '50% 50%' center the image under the content if the padding is unbalanced; thus CSS2's description of the 'background-position' property would be incorrect. ====== Secondly, a markup error in CSS1 is causing the entire document to become emphasised in lynx. Line 67, there is a missing </A>. ====== Finally, the errata document for CSS2 says: : Section 5.12.1 : : The rendering of the first example is: : : THIS IS A SOMEWHAT LONG HTML PARAGRAPH THAT : will be broken into several lines. : : while the fictional tag sequence is given as: : : <P>;<P:first-line> This is a somewhat long HTML : paragraph that will </P:first-line> ... : : The word "will" should follow the first fictional tag sequence for : :first-line. : There are two mistakes in the above. First, there is an extraneous semicolon (;) in the HTML snippet after the <P>. Secondly, the final paragraph should not have the word "first" before "fictional tag sequence", as there is only one such tag sequence. -- Ian Hickson
Received on Thursday, 14 January 1999 05:42:52 UTC