> However, I *think* <font size="+2"> is often treated as relative to the > base font size of the document, not the font size of the parent > element. It is. FONT SIZE=+/- is pretty bizarre and completely unrepresentable in CSS. For example: <FONT SIZE=-1><FONT SIZE=-1>Sample text 1</FONT></FONT> <SMALL><SMALL>Sample text 2</SMALL></SMALL> Sample text 2 will be smaller because SMALL is cumulative, and FONT SIZE=-1 is not. And yes, FONT SIZE=+/- is treated relative to the containing BASEFONT SIZE= tag. There is an implicit BASEFONT SIZE=3 somewhere near the top of the document tree. Blame HTML 3.2. TantekReceived on Tuesday, 17 August 1999 16:34:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:00 GMT