- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 14:53:47 +0100 (MET)
- To: sue@css.nu
- Cc: "w3c style" <www-style@w3.org>
Sue Sims wrote: > A "dedicated" tag is not required. My .rant class lives in my CSS > file, where it should. I might be interested in some sort of > standardization on commonly used class names (.note, .warning, .rant > et.al.). I think Todd posted some at one time, but I can't locate > them. I looked at the Dublin Core recently, but couldn't find them > there, either. I did locate, from Todd's base.css, the following: > > /* Suggested class names .advert .antithesis .callout .colophon > .conclusion .credit > .detail .excursus .offsite .hilite .initial .irony .key .legal > .marginalia .nav .note > .opposition .proposal .rant .remark .subhead .successive .summary > .synthesis .teaser > .thesis .title .warn */ > > Is there/should there be any effort to standardize on these? I don't think there is, I think there should. -h&kon
Received on Monday, 30 November 1998 08:53:50 UTC