forwarded message from gordon

Another victim of the spam-filter -- please update your subscription
to this list.

attached mail follows:

Actually I'd expect nothing less from these sites. Aren't they the same ones
that hard-code for 640 pixel width, when percentages would allow display at
any resolution? I think it's more of a vote for the lowest common
denominator (on both counts).

gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Knoblock <knoblock@worldnet.att.net>
To: www-style@w3.org <www-style@w3.org>
Date: Monday, January 12, 1998 12:29 PM
Subject: Media Types


>Have you noticed how many sites are implementing alternate pages for
>printing, when a print media style sheet is an easy alternative? Like CNET
>and ZDNet? Is this a vote of no confidence?
>
>Steve
>
>   _/ Steve Knoblock                      mailto:editor@city-gallery.com
>   _/ City Gallery                            http://www.city-gallery.com/
>   _/ Member NSA               http://www.3d-web.com/nsa/nsa.htm
>
>