forwarded message from gordon

Forwarded message 1

• From: gordon <gordon69b@earthlink.net>
• Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 15:43:08 -0500 (EST)
• Subject: [Spam?] Re: Media Types
• To: <www-style@w3.org>, "Steve Knoblock" <knoblock@worldnet.att.net>
• Message-ID: <000601bd1f9a$8ef3aa00$95f2d9cf@epidote>

Actually I'd expect nothing less from these sites. Aren't they the same ones
that hard-code for 640 pixel width, when percentages would allow display at
any resolution? I think it's more of a vote for the lowest common
denominator (on both counts).

gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Knoblock <knoblock@worldnet.att.net>
To: www-style@w3.org <www-style@w3.org>
Date: Monday, January 12, 1998 12:29 PM
Subject: Media Types


>Have you noticed how many sites are implementing alternate pages for
>printing, when a print media style sheet is an easy alternative? Like CNET
>and ZDNet? Is this a vote of no confidence?
>
>Steve
>
>   _/ Steve Knoblock                      mailto:editor@city-gallery.com
>   _/ City Gallery                            http://www.city-gallery.com/
>   _/ Member NSA               http://www.3d-web.com/nsa/nsa.htm
>
>