W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 1998

Re: text/css vs application/x-pointplus.

From: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 14:05:26 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980228140526.00a071c0@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
To: Sue Jordan <sjacct@worldnet.att.net>, "'W3C Style List'" <www-style@w3.org>
At 01:35 PM 28/02/98 -0500, Sue Jordan wrote:
>Failure of some ISPs to support the mime type text/css has been the
>subject of several discussions in the stylesheets newsgroup.  My
>attempt to rectify this with my ISP has resulted in this answer:
>
>"Unfortunately, that MIME extension is already mapped to something
>else in the standard MIME.types file that comes with our servers.
>Until IANA sorts out which extension goes with which application, we
>will maintain our MIME.types file as close to the manufacturer's
>recommendation as we can. So, for now, .css files remain as
>application/x-pointplus..."
>
>I find that IANA shows registration for neither text/css nor
>application/x-pointplus. Is this merely an oversight?  If this issue
>is already known, are we simply waiting for resolution of this
>apparent conflict?  Is there anything, short of changing ISPs, that we
>can do to rectify this? 

If your ISP's server is Apache, you may be able to add a .htaccess file to
the directory under which your CSS files are located.  The contents of the
.htaccess file would be

AddType text/css css

--
Liam Quinn
Web Design Group            Enhanced Designs, Web Site Development
http://www.htmlhelp.com/    http://enhanced-designs.com/
Received on Saturday, 28 February 1998 14:03:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:54 GMT