W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 1998

Re: overflow and subsequent boxesII

From: Frank Boumphrey <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 08:47:25 -0400
Message-ID: <009801bdc6b9$2beddc20$a9acdccf@ix.netcom.com>
To: <braden@endoframe.com>, "W3C Style Sheets Mailing List (E-mail)" <www-style@w3.org>
Following on from my previous post, I just tested it in Raptors viewer.exe
(NS5), and got the same result

Frank

Frank Boumphrey

XML and style sheet info at Http://www.hypermedic.com/style/index.htm
Author: - Professional Style Sheets for HTML and XML http://www.wrox.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Braden N. McDaniel <braden@shadow.net>
To: W3C Style Sheets Mailing List (E-mail) <www-style@w3.org>
Date: Thursday, August 13, 1998 3:16 AM
Subject: overflow and subsequent boxes


>Refer to the attached example. It is clear to me that the value of
>"overflow" should not affect the size of the box, and thus not affect where
>the border is drawn. What isn't clear to me is how the following box should
>be positioned. Should it start at the end of the overflowed text, or should
>it be adjacent the boundary of the previous box, just as if text had not
>overflowed?
>
>Braden
>
Received on Thursday, 13 August 1998 08:46:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:55 GMT