Re: CSS2 Progress

James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk>
>Hakon Lie <howcome@w3.org> wrote:

>>Participants were eager
>> to see the spec turing into a Proposed Recommendation sooner rather
>> than later. To gain speed, it's likely that some functionality will be
>> cut from CSS2 (multi-column text and headers/footers are cut
>> candidates).

>Going from previous experience, would the 'cutting' of such features be
>wise?
>If you decide to cut bits out, it'll only slow down progress.

I also think that cutting already published specification short just to
speed up the PR filing process is a bad idea. Even more so when a function
to be eliminated was published twice. Participants are always eager to speed
things up - they can afford it. Don't let them stress you.

/e