E. Stephen Mack wrote: > Which version of IE are both of you using? When I put that > declaration in IE 4.0 platform preview 2 (no shell integration) > on a Windows 95 system, the Headings are still rendered in their > customary size for me. Not wanting IE4p2 on my primary workstation if I can't also keep 3.02, I am still using 3.02. > IE 4.0pp2, on the other hand, keeps headings large and bold > and emphasized text in italics. The entire document does > take on sans-serif though, so I can see that this font > property is inheriting its way down. I think MS has stated there is a default stylesheet for IE4, so this would definitely be the correct behavior if font-family were only declared in HTML or BODY. > At this point, I think it becomes ESSENTIAL for the UA to > release their default style sheet. That will make working > with style sheets much simpler. In any case it looks like prudent authors will have to declare style for all elements they use. > Not necessarily, because font-style (normal | italic | oblique) > comes before font-weight ( normal | bold | [etc.]) in the > font syntax. Go back to your test document and put in > an ADDRESS element and an EM element, then see what your > version of IE does. If inheritance overrides one, it should override all. But this is the ancient 3.02, so inconsistency is normal. David PerrellReceived on Sunday, 27 July 1997 17:17:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:50 GMT