W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 1997

style sheets with ancient browsers

From: Joel N. Weber II <nemo@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 14:31:00 -1000 (HST)
To: www-style@www10.w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970111142624.22577K-100000@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>
The following example appears in section 1.1 of the CSS1 draft I'm 
looking at (a month or two old, but probably not changed from the current 
approved version)

  <HEAD>
    <TITLE>title</TITLE>
    <LINK REL=STYLESHEET TYPE="text/css"
      HREF="http://style.com/cool" TITLE="Cool">
    <STYLE TYPE="text/css">
      @import url(http://style.com/basic);
      H1 { color: blue }
    </STYLE>
  </HEAD>

The documentation goes on to state that the style sheet specified with 
<STYLE> will always be used, while the one specified by <LINK> is an 
optional alternative.

The problem is that primitive browsers (like old versions of Lynx) will 
display the stuff inside <STYLE>.  That seems wrong to me.  If the <LINK> 
and <STYLE> are equal, and I'm authoring a page, I'd use <LINK>.

Is there any reason they need to have different semantics?  If we really 
need different semantics, I'd prefer to have an attribute so that I can write

<LINK PRIORITY=alt .....>
<LINK PRIORITY=normal ...>
etc


nemo
                                                 http://www.cyclic.com/~nemo
<nemo@koa.iolani.honolulu.hi.us>                    <devnull@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"...For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners."  -- Mathew 9:13
Received on Saturday, 11 January 1997 19:34:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:46 GMT