W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 1996

Re: Relative weight - reader vs. author styles

From: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 15:40:49 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <9611181540.ZM1675@grommit.inria.fr>
To: David Perrell <davidp@earthlink.net>, Sherm Pendley <sherm@infoboard.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Sep 5,  4:59am, David Perrell wrote:

> I don't consider
> my sight to be unusually impaired, but I've seen many sites with dark
> type on a busy dark background that I can hardly read. I'd love to have
> an instant override.

A guess - you don't use a Mac or an SGI or a NeXT to browse with.

Another guess - the doument authors did. And it wasn't illegible to
them. The difference being gamma correction, ignoring which causes
errors of several hundred percent - especially for dark colors.

Note that the CSS1 specification defines what a color means, in terms of
measurable objective color specifications, and also that the minimum that
implementors must do to display these tightly specified colors is to
implement reasonable gamma correction.

So hopefully, you won't need to switch off stylesheets just because what
looked dark and moody (but legible) on a Mac became very dark and
unreadable on your system.



-- 
Chris Lilley, W3C                          [ http://www.w3.org/ ]
Graphics and Fonts Guy            The World Wide Web Consortium
http://www.w3.org/people/chris/              INRIA,  Projet W3C
chris@w3.org                       2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
+33 (0)4 93 65 79 87       06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 18 November 1996 09:41:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:46 GMT