W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 1996

RE: Gutter language

From: Erik Aronesty <earonesty@montgomery.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 12:50:17 -0700
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=Montgomery%l=EXCHANGE_SERVER-960710195017Z-20@sf-exch-2.montgomery.com>
To: "'David Perrell'" <davidp@earthlink.net>
Cc: "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>, "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>

alley is better than "column-gutter" or some other difficult to
remember, syntaxy thing that will annoy those people who aren't nerds.

i'm not saying it bothers me.... im the type who speaks c++ first,
englist second.  nevertheless, in developing a high level language for
financial calculations...i found that my best bet was to use words that
had a visual picture (alley) rather than a semantic description

>From: 	David Perrell[SMTP:davidp@earthlink.net]
>Sent: 	Wednesday, July 10, 1996 1:38 PM
>To: 	Erik Aronesty
>Subject: 	RE: Gutter language
>> so where do i vote?
>For now, any *public* feedback would be welcome. I was intending to
>propose the new name to Adobe and Corel, with specific changes in
>program menus and manuals.
>BTW, did you read about this on a message posted to www-html@w3.org or
>to www-style@w3.org?  I mailed a couple of messages to www-html@w3.org
>and they don't seem to have gotten posted, or at least they didn't come
>back in any Digest..
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 1996 15:57:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:40 UTC