W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 1996

Re: Introducing NetscapeML

From: Martin Hamilton <martin@mrrl.lut.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 1996 05:07:58 +0100
Message-Id: <199607030407.FAA08535@gizmo.lut.ac.uk>
To: "T. V. Raman" <raman@adobe.com>
Cc: Ka-Ping Yee <s-ping@orange.cv.tottori-u.ac.jp>, Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com>, www-style@w3.org, html-erb@w3.org, www-html@w3.org, raman@mv.us.adobe.com, thomasre@microsoft.com

"T. V. Raman" writes:

| Ka-Ping is right --in the world of free browsers users can *demand*
| not plead.
| To cite an example, I'm blind and use a talking computer. A couple of
| months ago, I was (temporarily) thrilled to see an announcement coming
| out of MicroSoft saying that their new browser would be accessible to
| blind users using screen-access programs --the almost total
| inaccessibility of NetScape has been a serious problem.

Just to echo this - my girlfriend is partially sighted (no snide 
remarks, please :-) and is quite happy using plain text email, but 
can't make any sense out of Web pages that are a mass of in-lined 
advertisments, in-lined backgrounds and coloured text, fonts, frames, 
applets and assorted multimedia crud^H^H^H^Hcontent.  So, it's 
heartening to hear that at least one browser vendor is thinking 
seriously about the problem of access.  I can almost forgive you for 
DOS and Windows*.  Almost.

If you're (associated with) a browser vendor which isn't particularly 
bothered about minority cases like hers - just bear in mind that 
there's a large market which has similar difficulties.  They're called 
*senior citizens*, and you may even live to be one yourself!

Received on Wednesday, 3 July 1996 00:11:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:40 UTC