- From: Gayle Kidder <reddik@thegroup.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1996 14:54:36 -0700
- To: Stephanos Piperoglou <stephanos@hol.gr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Stephanos Piperoglou wrote: > *cough* > > <PRE> > in Just- > spring when the world is mud- > luscious the little > lame baloonman > > whistles far and wee > </PRE> > > Include the relevant style definitions for a fixed width font of your choice > if you wish. Okay, you win. Though Bert's suggestion, while more elaborate, goes a little further towards correct in replacing the pixels with ems. But simpler is always better. That's precisely why STRONG, EM, CITE, CODE, etc. have not survived very well--they're too didactic and too complex to explain to people--while B, I and TT seem straightforward. I think SPACER may easily be replaced by something more straightforward, too. But that's not to say we don't need this function. (I still like IMG SRC=0). Gayle Kidder
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 1996 17:57:47 UTC