> Doing this by tag explosion would be fine, *IF* I could easily > extend the DTD the user agent is using (e.g., if we were all using > SGML browsers instead of HTML-only browsers). However, before you > take this as a vote for SGML browsers over HTML browsers, I do feel > that the focus on HTML has allowed us (the Web community) to establish > a ubiquitous baseline functionality that would be difficult if > everyone's approach had been SGML==>some dynamic DTD==>Stylesheet > hooks==>presentation from the beginning. Wrapping a > more-or-less-stable DTD and the stylistic properties applied to > elements in that DTD into one (easier-to-implement) package has > allowed HTML the glory of driving Internet publishing to incredible > heights. Great. So now that we've established a ubiquitous baseline functionality, can we turn our attention to developing approaches that will scale into the future? If not now, when? Jon --- Jon Bosak, SunSoft 2550 Garcia Avenue, Mountain View, CAReceived on Thursday, 15 February 1996 15:38:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:43 GMT