W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 1996

Re: BGSOUND, no need for it

From: Scott E. Preece <preece@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 08:37:43 -0500
Message-Id: <199608281337.IAA18710@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>
To: Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr
CC: cpj1@winternet.com, stephanos@trillian.hol.gr, www-style@w3.org, papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca, jaobrien@fttnet.com, www-html@w3.org
  From: Chris Lilley <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
| 
| I see no need to invent a different syntax and a whole new stylesheet
| language just to do non-visual rendering. I can confidently state that
| CSS was not designed to be limited to what you call a "DTP metaphor".
---

Well, it does seem possible that style information for audio, or other,
domains *might* need different selection mechanisms or degrees of
parameterizability, and that in some instances other domains might
require more maniipulation capability than CSS provides (an author might
be satisfied with CSS for text styling, but need to use DSSSL to do
content modifications for audio presentation, for instance).

scott

--
scott preece
motorola/mcg urbana design center	1101 e. university, urbana, il   61801
phone:	217-384-8589			  fax:	217-384-8550
internet mail:	preece@urbana.mcd.mot.com
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 1996 09:36:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:45 GMT