Jon Bosak wrote: > If you don't standardize this, the behavior you're looking for is not > possible to achieve. The comparison with paintings and books is > exactly right. You can't classify them. But if you don't classify > them, you can't find them. It's a good thing the librarians ignored > the fact that you can't precisely classify books and went ahead and > precisely classified them anyway. Books and paintings are classified by arbitrary types in a general sense, and sometimes debatably so. In a precise sense they are classified by title and author. David PerrellReceived on Monday, 12 August 1996 22:40:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:45 GMT