| y'all wrote: | | > I can see an advantage in allowing *any* common weight specifier. The | > UA simply keeps two heirarchical lists of all the common weight names | > with corresponding pointers. For example, the 'boldness' heirarchy | > might include, successively, 'nord, ultra-black, black, ultra-heavy, | > ultra-bold, super, heavy, extra-bold, bold, demi-bold, semi-bold, | > demi, medium, book, roman, regular, normal.' If someone specifies Does anyone care that there is already an ISO standard for font characteristics that addresses all of this? No? OK. Never mind. Have fun. Jon --- Jon Bosak, Online Information Technology Architect Sun Microsystems, 2550 Garcia Ave., MPK17-101, Mountain View, CA 94043 Davenport Group::SGML Open::ANSI X3V1::ISO/IEC JTC1/SC18/WG8::W3C SGML ERBReceived on Saturday, 10 August 1996 20:02:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:45 GMT