Jon Bosak wrote: > > Sigh. I see that in trying to clarify Doug Rand's statement, I have > completely misrepresented what he was (I think!) trying to say. For > the record, I should have typed > > [Doug Rand:] > > | As a standards body, W3 should make a choice of which style mechanism > | is the right one for HTML. Having [more than one] isn't acceptable. > ^^^^^^^^^ > > Sorry for the mistake, and I hope I got it right this time. Well, it was, after all, my fault for not stating it properly. I'm still in the position of wanting a single style sheet solution. What's been misunderstood is that my concern is more of a political one than a technical one. It seems acceptable to me that HTML has a solution which isn't the general SGML solution. I see no real flaw with this. But I worry as a developer that I may have to support not one, but two different systems which will make my browser eat that much more runtime memory. Doug -- Doug Rand <drand@sgi.com> (508) 567 - 2217 Silicon Graphics http://reality.sgi.com/employees/drand Digital Media Systems User Interface Technology Disclaimer: You think *I'm* opinionated?Received on Thursday, 25 April 1996 16:01:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:44 GMT