RE: Pseudo-classes and -elements from Michael Seaton on 1996-04-10 (www-style@w3.org from April 1996)

From: Michael Seaton <mseaton@inforamp.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 16:52:40 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Chris Wilson (PSD)" <cwilso@microsoft.com>
Cc: "'rieger@bse.de'" <rieger@bse.de>, "'Hakon Lie'" <howcome@w3.org>, "'www-style@www10.w3.org'" <www-style@www10.w3.org>
Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960410153414.18A-100000@diane.inforamp.net>

On Tue, 9 Apr 1996, Chris Wilson (PSD) wrote:
> At the very least, we should keep one of the pseudo-* separators as ':'
> to reduce upgrade woes.

My personal preference would be to retain ':' for pseudo-classes, and
use either '/' or '+' for pseudo-elements. 

When child elements are incorporated into CSS2, should they use the same 
separator as pseudo-elements?

--
Michael Seaton(mseaton@inforamp.net)

Received on Wednesday, 10 April 1996 16:52:50 UTC