Glenn Adams writes: > I've notice a lot of inconsistency in the conventions used for property > and property value identifiers names in the CSS 4.0 draft. > > For example, we have the following conventions used for compound identifiers: > > 1. xy, e.g., linebefore > 2. x-y, e.g., font-family > 3. x.y, e.g., insert.before 2 is the convention and is used throughout the document. 3 is a slip. 1 is value, not a property. Still, the same conventions should probably apply. Would you also want these changes?: a) shadowbox -> shadow-box b) lowerroman -> lower-roman c) box3d -> box-3-d d) alt-firstline -> alt-first-line e) inline -> in-line f) uppercase -> upper-case g) lowercase -> lower-case I think a-b should change. c-e I'm more uncertain about. f-g should remain unchanged as webster defines them as single words. Guidance is appreciated, -h&kon Hakon W Lie, W3C/INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France http://www.w3.org/People/howcome howcome@w3.orgReceived on Wednesday, 25 October 1995 03:40:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:42 GMT