W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 1995

Re: the STYLE attribute

From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 11:22:30 -0800 (PST)
To: Hakon Lie <Hakon.Lie@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: Joe English <joe@trystero.art.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.91.951110111952.28080F-100000@fully.organic.com>
On Fri, 10 Nov 1995, Hakon Lie wrote:
>  > >  - the STYLE attribute mixes presentational information into the
>  > >    structure of the docuement. This is just what style sheets try to
>  > >    avoid, and the attribute is therefore counter-productive.
>  > 
>  > I would think that a stronger argument against it
>  > is that it would tie HTML to a single stylesheet notation.
>  > Or is this stuff considered far enough past the ``experimental''
>  > stage that supporting different notations is no longer an issue?
> 
> No, we need to support different notations. The idea is to declare the
> notation somewhere, perhaps in a STYLE element in the header or as an
> attribute to BODY.

While it wouldn't tie HTML to a single style notation, it would tie a 
particular HTML document to a single style notation.  How bad it that?  
Certainly not worse than the current situation....

	Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  brian@hyperreal.com  http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Received on Friday, 10 November 1995 15:02:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:43 GMT