W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 1995

Re: Content-type and suggested file extensions for CSS

From: Hakon Lie <Hakon.Lie@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 1995 16:17:29 +0200
Message-Id: <199507261417.QAA20848@www4.inria.fr>
To: Mike Batchelor <mikebat@clark.net>
Cc: www-style@www10.w3.org
Mike Batchelor writes:

 > But off-hand, this seems reasonable:
 > text/stylesheet; version=css     (extension .css)
 > text/stylesheet; version=dsssl   (extension .dsssl or .dss) 
 > text/stylesheet; version=viola   (extension .ora or .viola)

Will style sheets always be text-based? How about:


It will probably be tougher to establish style as a main type (does
anyone have recent experiences with IANA on this?), and it may
encourage diversion rather than standardization. Is this good or bad?


Hakon W Lie, W3C/INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 1995 10:22:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:42 GMT