Scott E. Preece writes: > | Chris Lilley wrote (in response to Scott E. Preece): > | >So, in the interests of wrapping up - and knowing that you are unable to > | >attend WWW4, which is a pity as this issue will surely be discussed - > | >I would like to ask your opinion. If you could be there, and it came > | >to a vote, would you raise a blocking objection if the proposed STYLE > | >attribute was dropped, or constrained to point to a named style only? > > At this point I would still object to dropping it. Yes. Bert and I would not want to see this one go -- despite the good intensions. Regards, -h&kon Hakon W Lie, W3C/INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France http://www.w3.org/People/howcome howcome@w3.orgReceived on Friday, 8 December 1995 14:27:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:43 GMT