Hakon Lie <Hakon.Lie@sophia.inria.fr> wrote: > In CSS1, which is HTML-specific, '.' is a shorthand for "a class > called". CSS2 will introduce a way of declaring what attribute '.' > refers to: > > @archform CLASS This may not be all that useful for a general-purpose SGML formatter. Very few DTDs other than HTML have an attribute with the same semantics as CLASS. > Yes, and is very much in line with CSS thinking. A few questions > remain: > > - should one also allow the more verbose versions (CLASS=foo, > ID=x67y) in CSS1? Yes, unless it's only intended to be used with HTML. --Joe English joe@art.comReceived on Friday, 8 December 1995 13:04:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:43 GMT