W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 1995

RE: draft-ietf-html-style-00.txt & class as a general selector

From: <cwilso@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 08:22:27 -0800
Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-73-MSG951207082227CC00BC06@red-01-msg.itg.microsoft.com>
To: <www-style@w3.org>
Hakon writes:
>cwilso@microsoft.com writes:
> > I *WOULD* like to see, however, the ability to set style properties on a 

> > class independent of the element name.  E.g.: [CLASS="foo"] { color:blue 
>Yes, we plan to put this in. Various notations have been suggested:
> [CLASS="foo"] { color: blue }
> *.foo { color: blue }
> .foo { color: blue }

I agree that the first one is a little verbose, but it seems to fit nicely 
with the proposed addressing in CSS2.  I intensely dislike the second, 
because, as you said, it seems to indicate that any form of wildcards would 
work.  The third fits nicely (hmm, it might fall out of a parser easily), 
but does sort of look like a typo.

Received on Thursday, 7 December 1995 11:23:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:38 UTC