Dear SYMM WG- This is a Last Call review comment from the SVG WG on the SMIL Timesheets 1.0 specification, W3C Working Draft 10 January 2008, http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-timesheets-20080110/ . Please let us know if you have any questions by replying to www-svg@w3.org. As with the SMIL specs themselves, a definition list would be very helpful. Here are some terms that should be defined, either in this document, or in some other document with a direct reference link: * time container [1] * syncbase [2] * host language [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SMIL3/smil-timing.html#q167 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/SMIL3/smil-timing.html#q159 In general, the SVG WG finds the SVG spec notation to be more readable than SMIL Timesheets for all attribute values, and encourage the SYMM WG to use similar notation in SMIL Timesheets. See for example: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/painting.html#MarkerElement Regards- -Doug Schepers, on behalf of the SVG WGReceived on Saturday, 1 March 2008 22:45:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:37:39 GMT