> Hello, > > The new text will be published with the next release. > Here is an editor's draft copy (without the styling and images), but it > does indicate the text changes. > > -d. > PS: this text is not final and is subject to further change before > publication. Thanks... >This section is informative. Then it can be done in another way too by authors and implementors? >If the profile integrating the panZoom element allows each of the attribute >values to be animated, care should be taken to choose an animation >calculation mode that will yield predictable results (such as using a linear >mode). This sounds very vague, but this can be assumed to be solved, if this is specified in general, see last point in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-smil/2007OctDec/0048.html >The animation of mixed percentage/pixel values for height and width >is not recommended. It would be possible for the viewer to convert all of them to unitless values, see the suggestions in (the as informative styled) http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-SMIL3-20070713/smil-animation.html#animationNS-AnimationFunctionValueDetails In this specific case this still works pretty good, because all values describe a length somehow (for example in SVG fill and stroke may contain both interpolable values or URI/IRI of paint servers like gradients, a mixture cannot be converted to something interpolable in general, but this is a SVG problem, nothing to care about in SMIL). But it is ok too, to exclude this as a simplification for implementors, but then it should not be noted as informative?Received on Sunday, 28 October 2007 11:49:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:37:39 GMT