W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > October to December 2007

Re: [SMIL30 LC comment] 19. SMIL 3.0 Extended Mobile Profile ( LC-1800)

From: <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:04:07 +0000
To: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Cc: www-smil@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1IlMz1-0007Gw-V8@wiggum.w3.org>

 Dear Dr. Olaf Hoffmann ,

The SYMM Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last
Call Working Draft [2] of the Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language
(SMIL 3.0) published on 13 Jul 2007. Thank you for having taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at www-smil@w3.org if
you agree with it or not before 02 nov 2007. In case of disagreement, you
are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus
with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will
be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be
reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the
next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.


For the SYMM Working Group,
Thierry Michel
W3C Staff Contact

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/200708091253.27303.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-SMIL3-20070713/


Your comment on 19. SMIL 3.0 Extended Mobile Profile:
> Hello SMIL working group,
> some typos in chapter 19
> and a comment on 
> 'licensed media formats'
> 19.1
> typo?
> 'specifcation'
> -> 'specification'?
> ---------------
> 19.4.8
> typo/missing whitespace:
> 'and brushbrush elements'
> -> one brush to much?
> ------------
> 19.4.9
> 'The following licensed media formats are recommended to be
> supported:'
> Is it possible to offer links/references to the license conditions for
> example for ascii, utf-8, JPEG, PNG, SVG tiny etc?
> This could maybe simplify the decision for implementors to care about
> these formats or not ;o)
> (this applies to the other profile chapters as well)

Working Group Resolution (LC-1800):
The following typo's have been corrected:

>>'specifcation' -> 'specification'?

>> typo/missing whitespace: 'and brushbrush elements'

The other issue was a pointer to licensing conditions. This is difficult
to put in a W3C spec, since things may change. We will investigate during
the interop period and update all the profiles if this is feasible.

Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 11:04:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:28 UTC