- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:25:28 +0200
- To: www-smil@w3.org
Hello www-smil, While reading Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) W3C Working Draft 13 July 2007 I noticed several instances of the word 'must' in informative sections. This is problematic, due to the common usage of 'must' as a conformance requirement in W3C specifications. Please either a) reword these sections to avoid 'must', or b) add clarificatory wording regarding use of 'must' in the specification as a whole and noting any relationship to RFC 2119, or c) consider making some of the informative sections normative, if 'must' is indeed used as a conformance requirement in some cases -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2007 15:25:40 UTC