W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > April to June 2007

Urgent please

From: ___ <berlusconigay@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:56:34 +0200
To: "'SMIL List'" <www-smil@w3.org>
Message-ID: <011001c7b061$36324950$152ca8c0@luca56485194f3>

This situation is extremely easy to understand, please give me a reply
please. I'm using real player.

  <body>
    <par dur="indefinite">
	<par id="A_par" begin="bt_A.activateEvent" end="bt_B.activateEvent">
		......
	</par>
	<par id="B_par" begin="bt_B.activateEvent" end="bt_A.activateEvent">
		<par id="B_par_text1" begin="0s;arrow_b.activateEvent"
end="B_par.end;arrow_f.activateEvent">
			<textstream id="B_text1" src="..."
rn:backgroundOpacity="0%" transIn="fade_1" region="text_B_a"
end="B_par_text1.end;bt_A.activateEvent" fill="freeze"/>
			<textstream id="B_text2" src="..."
rn:backgroundOpacity="0%" transIn="fade_1" region="text_B_b"
end="B_par_text1.end;B_par.end" fill="freeze"/>
		</par>
		<par id="B_par_text2" begin="arrow_f.activateEvent"
end="B_par.end;arrow_b.activateEvent">
			.......
		</par>
	</par>
    </par>
  </body>
</smil>

Why when B_text1 and B_text2 are visible, and i click on bt_A, only B_text1
disappear?
The difference between B_text1 and B_text2 is that the end differ in this
way:

B_text1 --> B_par_text1.end;bt_A.activateEvent
B_text2 --> B_par_text1.end;B_par.end

BUT, since B_par group has the end attribute set to: bt_A.activateEvent,
shouldn't B_par.end and bt_A.activateEvent act the SAME way?


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.17/850 - Release Date: 15/06/2007
11.31
 
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:57:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:53:29 GMT