W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: frozen value for discrete animation

From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:44:43 +0200
To: www-smil@w3.org, cogit@ludicrum.org
Message-Id: <200706061144.44194.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>

Yes, would be fine to have this as an additional
informative example in the specification for
keyTimes 1. It is not really needed to change
the specification. keyTimes 1 is only not very
useful for discrete animation, but these 
exception rules define the behaviour and
such an example points out, how the correct
behaviour is, if keyTimes 1 is used.
The described behaviour is as I expected for
accumulate none/sum. 

The other interesting/informative example results 
from an additional end at 15s or a max of 15s or a 
repeatDur of 15s or a repeatCount of 1.5 for the 
this example.
And I still think, the result is different in SMIL2
from the old SMIL animation recommendation or
from SVG behaviour because of new specific
exeptions in SMIL2 from the interval timing model,
I could not find in the old SMIL animation 
recommendation, and a slightly other definition
of the fill attribute.
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 10:11:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:26 UTC