W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: [SMIL21 REC] 10.4.1: Wrong example for end and begin with user interactivity?

From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:53:17 +0200
To: www-smil@w3.org
Message-Id: <200608090953.17863.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>


ok, thank you, I think, this is very helpful for my understanding
of the begin time list and the end time list.
As far as I understand now, the end time list is only related to
the content of the end attribute and not to all possible end times
of the active duration. This seems to be my misunderstanding
and confusion with different ends with different meanings.
This is much simpler as I expected ;o)
Then it is quite clear, that the Adobe plugin and Opera and me 
are wrong with the interpretation examples like this.
The Adobe plugin, Opera and KSVG1 seem to be wrong even
with a simpler example like
dur="10s" begin="5s" end="4s"
Looks really like some further work is needed to get the correct 
interpretation common too...

Thanks again for your help to understand this in detail...

> No further ends are generated.  According to the recommendation in the
> section Computing the active duration:
> "Otherwise, an end value not equal to indefinite is specified along with
> at least one of dur, repeatDur, and repeatCount. Then the PAD  is the
> minimum of the result from the Intermediate Active Duration Computation
> given below and duration between end and the element begin:
>     PAD = MIN( Result from Intermediate Active Duration Computation,
> end - B)"
> There is a difference between having an "end" attribute on an element
> and not having an "end" attribute on an element.  If you do not have an
> "end" attribute, it is more or less like you describe, but if you *do*
> have an "end" attribute, it determines the end.  The simple
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 07:50:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:25 UTC