W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: [SMIL21 REC] 10.4.1: Wrong example for end and begin with user interactivity?

From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:09:14 +0200
To: www-smil@w3.org
Message-Id: <200608071109.14854.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>

Hello,

of course, this interval is rejected, because it is bad, but there
are other times, that have to be added to the end list, to determine 
with begin and dur a correct simple duration and begin and
repeatDur to determine active duration including repetition.
Just this value of the end attribute is meaningless, if the begin 
is later as end.
In the audio example dur is determined by the media itself
with an implicit end, therefore even there is no difference to 
the svg animation example.

It is just pseudo code and begin+dur or begin+repeatDur
generate further 'end's in the list. There is more than one 
time in the end list and therefore there are some 
'good intervals' to care about. 


Best wishes


>
> Your interpretation and that of Opera and Adobe is *incorrect*.  After
> t=30s the element cannot start again.  Study the pseudo code in
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SMIL2/smil-timing.html#Timing-BeginEnd-LC-Start>,
> and especially the bit where it says: "if all ends are before the begin,
> bad interval".  This shows that if there is an end attribute, and all
> values in the end attribute are before the current time, there is no
> interval, and thus the element will not play.
>
> I hope this helps.
Received on Monday, 7 August 2006 09:10:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:53:29 GMT