Thierry, A colleague recently directed me to [1]. I'm pleased to see the use of RDF, but noticed several anachronisms and inconsistencies with the current Semantic Web specs: The rdfs namespace should be http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#, per [2]. The dc namespace should be http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/, as in [3]. The about, ID, and resource attributes should be rdf:about, rdf:ID, and rdf:resource, per [4]. Property names should preferably be lowerCamelCase rather than UpperCamelCase. It would be preferable if smilmetadata:Duration used xsd:duration PT60S rather than "60 secs". LevelAccessibilityGuidelines should presumably have a namespace prefix. Thanks! Mike http://www.daml.org/people/mdean/ [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20050107/metadata.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210/ [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/Received on Thursday, 1 September 2005 04:41:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:37:37 GMT