- From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:02:07 +0200
- To: Kari Pihkala <kpihkala@cc.hut.fi>
- CC: ietf-types@iana.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, www-smil@w3.org
Kari, good catches ! See inline for more Kari Pihkala wrote: > > Hi, > > I noticed some inconsistencies with the SMIL namespaces in the > draft. In section 4: > > All SMIL 2.0 files must also include a declaration of the SMIL 2.0 > namespace. This should appear shortly after the string "<smil", and > should read 'xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/PR/Language"'. Fixed this to use http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/Language as namespace. > However, a different namespace in the end of section 5: > > An example use of this parameter as part of a HTTP GET transaction > would be: > > Accept: application/smil+xml; > profile="http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/REC/HostLanguage" Removed the REC part. The namespace should be different, I think, since this is the way that a client informs a server that it supports SMIL basic. I'm not sure that people actually use the following URI to identify SMIL basic, however http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/REC/HostLanguage or that anyone uses the "accept" header at all - I'll send a seperate message to the www-smil list on that. > Also, either of these namespaces match the one in SMIL 2.0 spec > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil20-20010807/smil20-profile.html): > 13.3.2 SMIL 2.0 Language Conformance > > 5. A document must declare a default namespace for its elements with an > xmlns attribute on the smil root element with its identifier URI: > <smil xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/Language"> > ... > </smil> > > You may want to check these... > > - Kari ...
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 10:06:32 UTC