- From: Rob Lanphier <robla@real.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:55:53 -0800
- To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>, Andrew Daviel <andrew@daviel.org>, <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, <www-smil@w3.org>, "'Philipp Hoschka'" <ph@w3.org>
At 01:30 PM 12/11/00 , Patrik Fältström wrote: >At 13.17 -0800 00-12-11, Andrew Daviel wrote: >>WAV seems to be the defacto standard, though I confess that there seem to >>be many flavours and it is at heart a proprietary format. MP3, anyone > >Do we have someone reading these messages which can let me know if I am >right or wrong when claiming that we talk about a sort of three layer >architecture: > > Codec > Format > Transport > >In the case of Waw, that is not a codec, but a format, which allow >different codecs. You are correct (typo excluded). Wav is a file format which may contain many different codecs >Has anyone seen any compilation on what various "words" actually mean? Try the RTSP FAQ: http://www.realnetworks.com/devzone/library/rtsp/faq.htm Some of the information is a little outdated, but this particular question is a timeless one. :) Rob
Received on Monday, 11 December 2000 16:56:09 UTC