Re: 3GPP-T-WG3 codecs

At 14.39 -0500 00-12-07, Philipp Hoschka wrote:
>In general, I'm a bit confused about the request - why would the
>IETF have to comment on the minimal set of codecs in a format
>defined by another organisation ? This would make sense if the
>goal is to define a minimal set of codecs that need to be supported
>by MIME mail readers, but otherwise, I don't see the point - am
>I missing something ?

Because they want to have the same codecs in the other organization 
as we define for use in the IETF I guess.

    paf


-- 

Received on Thursday, 7 December 2000 19:36:13 UTC