- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:41:36 +0100
- To: "www-rdf-validator@w3.org" <www-rdf-validator@w3.org>
- CC: Ian Millard <icm@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "fred@zigist.com" <fred@zigist.com>
We seem to have a problem with validating URIs (which we have had for a long time). For example: http://southampton.rkbexplorer.com/id/person-00021 The RDF is fine, if I cut and paste. But if I provide the URI it rejects with RDF Load Error An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://southampton.rkbexplorer.com/data/person-00021' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 12749 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.) And similarily: http://eprints.rkbexplorer.com/id/ecs-soton/person-07113 Gives An attempt to load the RDF from URI 'http://eprints.rkbexplorer.com/id/ecs-soton/person-07113' failed. (Undecodable data when reading URI at byte 0 using encoding 'UTF-8'. Please check encoding and encoding declaration of your document.) It seems that the validator is sensitive to the order of the verbs in the header, which it should not be (we think). (Because of the way we generate the RDF, we sometimes get different orders.) Are we wrong, or is the validator? (This is a problem for us, because it means Zitgist cannot view our RDF, as it seems to validate before being willing to look at it.) Best Hugh -- Hugh Glaser, Reader Dependable Systems & Software Engineering School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ Work: +44 (0)23 8059 3670, Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 3045 Mobile: +44 (0)75 9533 4155, Home: +44 (0)23 8061 5652 http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/people/hg
Received on Saturday, 4 April 2009 12:42:27 UTC